Absolutely terrible article by 71 Republic

I recently saw this article by 71 republic here, about how “ultra conservatism” is un-libertarian. Well that is categorically false. Social conservatism, defined by Hoppe, as personal responsibility, low time preferences, family authority, and un-hedonistic parasitcal behavior is the only socio-compatibile factor with anarcho-capitalism, i.e., the natural order. The worst part of the discombobulated article is this part:

“The mind of a human is one’s greatest ally but can also serve as the silent, unknown enemy. We think with our mind, and our decisions arise from there. Ultra-conservative “libertarians”, whether knowingly or not, want to control the minds of others. This form of tyranny is worse than both the state and the corporations combined, as they wish to change the course of an individual’s life that was already chosen by themselves. “

 

What in the world do you even mean? The state attempts to change our minds to leftist hedonist crap all the time, with their big government subsidies to public education, etc! Corporations attempt to do so, and even more so when they are under the state’s influence. See the CIA controlling Corporations here.

 

Another part I thought was absolute garbage was here:

 

“By influencing the morality and attempting to control the actions of a conscious, is one not engaging in tyranny?”

 

Um, I’m sorry to inform you, but that is not a definition of tyranny. That might be a left-libertarian definition of tyranny, but from the NAP, private property ethic, tyranny is when some body X coerces you into doing something, with you property and your body. Property owners are free to coerce on their own property.

 

The writer of the article, “James Sweet III”, seems to misunderstand libertarianism. He says:

“There is much more to libertarian socialism than what I just described, and I will admit that I have not read libertarian socialist literature. Yet, from what Noam Chomsky has said, it is rational to infer that the difference between a libertarian socialist and a right-wing libertarian is the enemy they see in society. A right-wing libertarian sees the state as the most corrupt institution that exists and should be restrained as much as possible in an attempt to minimize its influence in the lives of the individual. A libertarian socialist might agree with this but believes the state is not alone in its faults. A libertarian socialist, for the reason stated previously, believes that the 21st-century corporation is at fault for many problems as well and that they should not be spared from criticism. Yet, both libertarian socialists and right-wing libertarians want to reduce the power of the state, and they split when it comes to what they do once the state is reduced or abolished. Do they rely on corporations, or do they rely on voluntary, communal sharing of goods under a free and equal market that is unobstructed by the corruption of suits and ties?”

The fundamental difference between libertarians and non-libertarians(socialists anarcho-commies), is that libertarians recognize the Non-agression principle of people’s bodies and private properties. Anarcho-Communists belive in the supposed “voluntary” communism. Literally.  They don’t believe in self-ownership or private property rights. They are not libertarian. They should be expelled out of civilization and out of the Libertarian Party. Simple.

Just because libertarians share some beliefs with anarchists, i.e., foreign policy, etc, that doesn’t mean libertarians = leftists, commies, animals. 

 

By Hoppean Ancap

go to subreddit

r/Hoppeanism

and v/PhysicalRemoval2 for more(voat.co).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

u/Anenome5’s Monopoly and Power over the Ancap subs and also over reddit admin

So recently, my account u/Public_Delivery was banned along with many other pro-Hoppean accounts called u/HoppeanCrypto, u/HoppeanAncap, and u/LateTransportation7. u/Public_Delivery was my only alt account, and so is u/InsuranceDefenseCor0. By the way, this is u/PracticalSpecialist speaking.

Premises: When I refer to Anemone, I refer to his two accounts u/Anen-o-me and u/Anenome5. I know this for absolute certainty, because he tells us here:

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 9.56.15 PM.png

I may or may not be able to provide links for all of my screenshots, but hopefully the massive screenshot archive will suffice. I will prove to you ancaps that Anenome controls every anarcho-capitalist sub on reddit. I will also prove to you that Anenome controls more than 100 alt accounts, including u/Z3F, u/BastiatFan, u/955bsp, u/Bastiatinator, u/ConsistentParadox, and many more.

 

So let me detail this. u/Hoppeanancap posted this on reddit.

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 9.41.46 PM.png

 

 

Then it got swiftly removed, by I suspiciously reckon that u/Z3F is u/Anenome5. Now this was sort of implied after it got removed by the mods(I’m presuming u/Z3F, as u/Mokky is pretty chill).  So then, apparently u/Hoppeanancap wrote this.

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 9.44.11 PM.png

And then, remember, this sub is small, at only 291 readers. So u/Z3F would’ve been probably the only ones to see this.

Then this appears.

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 9.45.57 PM.png

 

 

So apparently, u/Anenome5 is u/Z3F and u/formerlyflintlox.

Now, I don’t know exactly if u/Anemone5 is joking or not, but this guy has been on reddit for 8 years. His other openly admitted account, u/Anen-o-me has 160k plus karma and 104 subreddits, and most of them prominent ancap subs.

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 9.48.04 PM.png

 

 

 

u/Anenome5 mods 322 subreddits, most of ancap, and including r/GoldandBlack, r/Anarcho-Capitalism, and r/Libertarian(through u/Z3F).

 

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 9.48.26 PM.png

 

 

 

So now that is out of the way, we can see, how many alt-accounts does u/Anenome5 have?

So we know he is a prolific subreddit creator, is he a prolific account creator too? I think that he is. There can be no doubt about it. I have encountered many posts in which it is implied.

 

 

 

And then, comes the ban.

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 10.47.39 PM.png

u/Anemone5 states this:

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 10.39.17 PM.png

 

And then, Immediately this:

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2019-01-08 at 10.52.26 PM.png

 

 

Now this begs the question.

 

u/Anenome5. Are you a reddit admin?

 

 

 

Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics

Argumentation
Here is the original paper: https://mises.org/wire/primer-hoppes-argumentation-ethics
Here is a guide: http://www.stephankinsella.com/2015/01/argumentation-ethics-and-liberty-a-concise-guide-2011/
Here is Stephen Kinsella refuting criticisms
http://www.anti-state.com/stephan-kinsella/
http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/defending-argumentation-ethics/
Here is a video of Hans Hoppe speaking at Property and Freedom Society (PFS) about the “Ethics of Argumentation”

The Journey Begins!

Thanks for joining me! In this Blog I will attempt to refute, destabilize, and destroy the childish and hedonistic Left-Libertarian Movement.

This blog affirms that the Misesian-Rothbardian-Blockian-Hoppean position in economics and political philosophy is correct and the “one true faith”, as Walter Block likes to say.

This blog’s point of view will be from a pure Misesian-Rothbardian Austrian economics.

This blog’s political philosophy will be of anarcho-capitalism, namely, deonotological ethics. Murray N. Rothbard founded the anarcho-capitalist and libertarian movements.

David Friedman’s utilitarianism offers good supplementations to natural rights theory, but it by itself is lacking in justice, principles, and rights.

Hope you guys enjoy the posts here! Feel free to message me to post!

It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance. — Murray N. Rothbard

serveimage-2.jpg